
|
Social Impact Analysis
From $1
Overview As experience with recent disasters has shown, comprehensive
assessment of damage, needs, vulnerabilities and capacities plays a key
part in providing effective frameworks for recovery. Often however
there is insufficient attention paid to the impact of recovery on
addressing social vulnerability and livelihoods and a general failure
to include affected communities in recovery planning and programming,
especially in its earliest phases. In general there is still need for a
better understanding of how social groups are affected differently by
disasters, what are the broader impacts and secondary impacts on social
infrastructure and livelihoods systems, and what means might be most
effective for reducing both immediate and future risks.
Strengthening assessment in these areas requires more attention to
social vulnerability and livelihoods analysis, greater emphasis on the
participation of affected communities, closer collaboration with civil
society organisations to reach communities and strengthen social
protection and safety nets, and increased analysis of risks and
mitigation opportunities. In fact when asked in the context of reviews
of the responses to recent disasters, communities have consistently
stated a lack of involvement in identifying their needs and
prioritising strategies for recovery assistance. Many of these points
have also been highlighted in the recent Tsunami Evaluation Coalition
review of “The role of needs assessment in the tsunami response”
(available at http://www.tsunami-evaluation.org). Current initiatives "Strengthening the Social Analysis Component in Rapid Impact and Vulnerability Assessment" Together with the IFRC, ProVention recently organised a workshop in
January 2007 in Panama to share experience and ideas for strengthening
the social analysis components in post-disaster rapid
impact/vulnerability assessment. The workshop focused in particular on
assessment in the first 1-4 weeks after a disaster, drawing on the
knowledge and experience of a range of international and regional
organisations. Results of the workshop will be made available soon on
the ProVention website.
ProVention, IFRC, UNDP, ECALC, the World bank and other
partners are now working to develop a Technical Reference Group on
Social Analysis to inform the ongoing revision of the ECLAC assessment
methodology.
Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) UNDP, ILO, and ECLAC are currently leading an initiative to develop
an improved set of tools for post-disaster needs assessment. The
primary purpose of the PDNA is to provide all actors in the recovery
process, including national and local authorities, international
agencies and local communities, with a multi-sectoral, technical
overview of the damage and loss patterns and the principal
rehabilitation and reconstruction needs and priorities to be addressed
during post disaster recovery. The PDNA will also ensure smooth
transition and better articulation between emergency response and early
recovery. For more information, see:
Other related initiatives All India Disaster Mitigation Institute
Based on its experience working with communities in India that have
been affected by large disasters over the last 10 years, AIDMI has
developed a number of innovative tools for engaging with communities in
post-disaster assessment and recovery planning, including the Community Damage Assessment and Demand Analysis guide.
AIDMI has also developed a number of case studies to highlight experience and lessons learned after specific disasters.
Community Risk Assessment Toolkit (ProVention and other partners)
The CRA Toolkit is a collection of methodologies and case studies on
participatory community risk assessment along with guidance notes to
help users identify the most appropriate assessment methodologies and
applications. For more information, see Community Risk Assessment Toolkit Community Risk Reduction Index (Oxfam) Isabelle Bremaud, the Regional Humanitarian Adviser for
Disaster Risk Reduction for Oxfam GB for Central America, Mexico and
the Carribean, has presented an overview of a community risk reduction
index that Oxfam developed with partners in Haiti. This index included
10 parameters covering physical safety, hazard awareness,
organisational preparedness, recovery ability, social capital,
psychological resilience, cultural capital, and political capital.
Oxfam’s current programming also emphasizes contingency planning at
both national and community levels as a key tool for both risk
reduction and planning for effect assessment activities. For more
information, see the Risk-Mapping and Local Capacities: Lessons from Mexico and Central America report.
Oxfam is also a partner in the Emergency Capacity Building
initiative, a collaborative effort of seven humanitarian agencies that
are jointly tackling common problems in emergency response and
preparedness.
Emergency Food Security Assessment (WFP) The World Food Programme has developed the Emergency Food
Security Assessment to help identify immediate basic needs for water,
food, and health care. This assessment is meant to facilitate a
comprehensive analysis of the impact of disasters or other shocks at
the micro level (community and household) and an analysis of the three
dimensions of food security – availability, access, and utilisation.
The assessment itself includes three phases: initial investigation,
rapid assessment, and in-depth follow-up assessment of the situation
and underlying causes.
For more information, see : Health Assessment (PAHO)
The Pan American Health Organisation has a range of resource available
about assessing health impacts after disasters and assessing the
capacities of health facilities to respond to future disaster risks in
PAHO's ‘Virtual Disaster Library for Disasters’.
Household Economic Approach (Save the Children)
"The HEA was developed by Save the Children (UK) in order to provide an
effective approach to predicting the effects of drought and other
economic shocks on rural populations. It has been widely adopted within
Save the Children, by the UN and by governments, both to provide a
quantitative description of the economy of a defined population and to
analyse the relationship between a shock and the ability of households
to maintain their food and non-food consumption." For more information, see The Household Economy Approach: A resource manual for practitioners Needs Assessment in Response (Tsunami Evaluation Coalition)
One of five thematic evaluations undertaken by the Evaluation Coalition
(TEC) on the international humanitarian response the tsunami, "this
report evaluates the adequacy, appropriateness and effectiveness of the
assessment the first three months after after the tsunami. It focuses
on the impact of assessment on the response of international agencies
and institutional donors and, ultimately, on the affected populations". For more information, see The Role of Needs Assessment in the Tsunami Response Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment (Benfield Hazard Research Centre)
Charles Kelly at the Benfield Hazard Research Centre, and in
collaboration with CARE and other partners, has been developing a set
of resources to guide Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment, including
analysis of both the affected communities and the organisations
involved in the response and recovery. This work has been developed
around a set of core lessons learned from past disasters: - environmental conditions often contribute to disasters
- disaster generate significant volumes of debris and recovery can’t start until the debris is removed
- relief and recovery aid can have a positive or negative environmental impact
- failure to systematically incorporate environmental impact assessment can jeopardize disaster management efforts
- there is presumption that recovery will not have new negative
environmental impacts if something which was already existing is just
being replaced
For more information, see the resources on Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment in disaster response.
Kelly has also recommended a set of other related resources: Recovery Index (UN University – Institute for Environment and Human Security) Together with the University of Colombo and other partners,
UNU-EHS developed a “recovery index” in Sri Lanka that was a measure of
recovery potential based on the estimated reconstruction cost of each
house (by damage category) divided by the free available income of the
household. The survey showed significant differences in the percentage
of households needing more than 2 years to recover between the towns of
Gall and Batticaloa. The survey also showed significant differences in
projected recovery times among households with different primary job or
livelihood types.
For more information, see a summary of the recovery index project .
REDLAC Rapid Assessment The REDLAC partners in Latin America have drafted a
methodology and tools of rapid humanitarian impact assessment to better
support the develop of joint initiatives for disaster response that
maximize the use of existing resources and and have the greatest impact
on preventing and mitigating vulnerability to future disasters. For more information, contact Douglas Reimer at the REDLAC Risk, Emergency and Disaster Task Force in Panama. Tool for Participatory Assessment in Operations (UNHCR) UNHCR has been working with several partner organisations
to develop a tool to support UNHCR Branch and Field Offices in
conducting participatory assessments together with partners. The tool
covers a range of components in situation anaylsis including: - Analysis of existing information
- Participatory assessment
- Participatory planning
For more information, see UNHCR Tool for Participatory Assessment in Operations UNICEF UNICEF has developed a range of tools for assessing
protection, health, nutrition, education, HIV, and water &
sanitation issues after disasters. For more information, see the UNICEF Emergency Field Handbook. Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (IFRC)
The IFRC has developed a programme and set of tools for working with
communities to identify vulnerabilities to disaster risks and
capacities for implementing effective risk reduction measures. The
approach focuses on active participation of key community stakeholders
to enable them to identify and prioritise needs (which are not always
as obvious as they seem). Now in use for more than 10 years, these
tools are being used in increasingly effective ways to better
understand various dimensions of vulnerability and to link
post-disaster rapid assessment to previous knowledge of risk.
For more information, see the The World Bank The World Bank uses the ECLAC methodology on a regular
basis to estimate the broad range of disaster impacts and their
implications on the economic and social sectors, physical
infrastructure, and environmental assets. Recognising that there is a
need to strengthen relationships and capacity for social sector
analysis and coordination, the World Bank is also seeking to establish
more effective partnering in assessment on the ground and has recently
issued a revised policy on emergency response and recovery assistance.
The ECLAC manual is available on the World Bank website: ECLAC Manual.
After the earthquake in Yogyakarta in May 2006, the World Bank worked
closely with the IFRC to integrate assessment information on social
impacts being undertaken by NGOs through community surveys into the
comprehensive Bank and government-led assessment process. This
cooperation was viewed to have been quite successful in terms of
raising the profile of risk reduction in World Bank planning and in
linking the broader socio-economic analysis of the World Bank to the
assessment activities being undertaken by NGOs and other organisations
at community levels and across a broad range of sectoral topics.
The World Bank Institute offers several training modules on assessment, including the Introduction to Damage and Reconstruction Needs Assessment Toolkit.
|